Hi
Im trying to get some answers via google and other peoples experiences in regards to why bone grafting is such an automatic part of a reatment plan when there has been no pano taken.?
I am in process of getting my #30 extracted. Deep decay under gumline (or so it says) But they want to do a bone graft when i have fresh bone still and enough of it. Cant surgeons just do the implant after the extraction?
I understand when you have a single tooth missing for some time and your middle aged (as i am 57) Its undertandable that it would be prudent to bone graft with my #19 as it has been missing 9 yrs.
But for a new extraction, and im in good health with decent bone.. why wouldnt they do the implant without the grafting? Its like everyone now should have a bone graft with the plan regardless of if its needed or not?
any answers or thoughts appreciated
Im trying to get some answers via google and other peoples experiences in regards to why bone grafting is such an automatic part of a reatment plan when there has been no pano taken.?
I am in process of getting my #30 extracted. Deep decay under gumline (or so it says) But they want to do a bone graft when i have fresh bone still and enough of it. Cant surgeons just do the implant after the extraction?
I understand when you have a single tooth missing for some time and your middle aged (as i am 57) Its undertandable that it would be prudent to bone graft with my #19 as it has been missing 9 yrs.
But for a new extraction, and im in good health with decent bone.. why wouldnt they do the implant without the grafting? Its like everyone now should have a bone graft with the plan regardless of if its needed or not?
any answers or thoughts appreciated